The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission released their final changes to the Hart-Scott-Rodino reporting form on July 7, 2011. For your reference, here is what leading law firms are saying about how those changes will affect merger reporting for your company:
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Tuesday, May 03, 2011
"Summary: There are several steps that a company should take when performing pre-acquisition FCPA due diligence. Yesterday at the Hanson Wade FCPA conference in Houston, some of these steps were discussed. While these steps are not an exhaustive list, they do provide a company with some guidance on specific issues to investigate to protect themselves from buying not only a new company but a FCPA enforcement action."
Conducting Pre-Acquisition FCPA Due Diligence Thomas Fox - JDSupra
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Copyrights arise automatically when an original work is fixed in a tangible medium of expression. These rights include the exclusive right to copy the work, to distribute the work, to prepare derivative works based on the pre-existing work, and, for certain types of works, to perform and display the work. Each of these rights can be separately transferred or licensed. Moreover, each of the rights can also be subdivided and licensed to more than one licensee.
The large number of ways in which copyright rights can be divided and subdivided increases the complexity of copyright licensing. Copyright owners can license any one or a combination of the rights and a license can be limited in scope, for example to specific media, territory, or uses.
To make the situation even more complicated, there are many different types of works that can be protected by copyrights. These include literary works, musical works, dramatic works, pantomimes and choreography, pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works, motion pictures and other audiovisual works, sound recordings, and architectural works. Each type of work presents its own complex issues.
For example, music licenses have many unique issues that need to be addressed, both factual and legal. The same is true with respect to licenses for fine arts, sculptural works, and theatrical works. Similarly, software licenses involve an array of legal and technical issues that must be understood when preparing a written license. Technology licenses, including biotechnology licenses, are similarly specialized. Copyright licenses can be used in connection with advertising, marketing materials, web site designs, manuals, and computer software.
Each type of license has its own quirks. To understand the basics, see this outline from Pillsbury Winthrop from PLI.
Posted by Anthony Cerminaro at Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Thursday, May 01, 2008
Partially adapted from the "Training Manual on Technology Transfer", by United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
Identification of the parties
The opening paragraph should identify the parties to the agreement with their official names, addresses and, when applicable, the location of their governing law of incorporation. Corporations should be identified as patent and subsidiary, patent, or subsidiary alone, and their legal capacity or authority should be given.
Care in specifying the parties to an agreement ensures precise identification of licensing and licensed parties. For the licensor, this precludes the possibility of extending the licence beyond the intended entity or of not including all of the include entity. For the licensing party extend to the entire intended entity.
The purpose of an agreement should be stated in a brief paragraph that captures the essence of why the licence agreement is being executed. It can be as simple as “ This agreement is to permit company A to make, use and sell product X in the territory, as defined in the agreement, with the help of the technical assistance and the know-how licensed under this agreement, by company B and under the licensed patents as defined in this agreement. ‘ A statement can also be made, either in this section or in the whereas clauses, on the economic aim of the contract, i.e. to produce the licensed goods economically and competitively.
Effective date of the agreement
The data when the agreement comes into full force and effect is often stated in a separate paragraphs. It can come before or after the date the agreement is signed. The effective date is sometimes defined in the definitions section of the agreement when conditions prevent showing just the date itself.
Some countries require government approval after the parties to an agreement have agreed to all of its provisions and have executed ( signed ) the document. In those cases the date of the government approval usually becomes effective date.
Whereas clauses (recitals, preamble)
The whereas clauses give the background and rationale for the agreement . They should be worded carefully to clarify the terms and conditions for people from either party who were not involved in making the agreement but who are asked later to settle conflicts between the parties. Clarity is also important in the event legal action is taken by one party against the other. In a court of law the judge may look to the whereas clauses to improve his understanding of clauses that may be difficult to interpret. Whereas clauses contain such things as licensor and licensee representation and background of the agreement.
For the rest of this checklist which is a reproduction of a page from www.tannedfeet.com see this post.
Posted by Anthony Cerminaro at Thursday, May 01, 2008
Friday, February 29, 2008
For M&A, the basic policy is as follows:
Foreigners are permitted to purchase small Chinese companies that the central government is not interested in managing.
Foreigners are permitted to purchase large, state-owned enterprises that suffer from financial difficulty, provided the foreign investor agrees to restructure the purchased company.
Foreigners are permitted to purchase non-majority interests in strong, successful Chinese companies, but only if there is some added benefit, such as transfer of technology, advanced management or access to foreign markets.
Foreigners are not permitted to purchase a majority interest in a large and financially successful Chinese company. Even smaller companies are off the table if they are financially sound and work in a core technology field or have created a strong or historically important brand.
China is remarkably receptive to direct foreign investment that creates new business activity in China. The policy towards the purchase of existing businesses and assets is the opposite. Such purchases are strongly disfavored, since they are seen as providing no net benefit to China. Under this policy regime, venture capital and troubled company buy-out businesses have plenty of room to operate. Strategic alliances in core industries also work well.
On the other hand, traditional private equity that focuses on the outright purchase of strong and successful companies simply does not work under this system. Central government regulators will consistently step in and exercise their veto powers to prevent the foreign acquisition of a majority interest in any existing, strong Chinese company. This is not likely to change anytime soon.
Read more in this article from China International Business
Posted by Anthony Cerminaro at Friday, February 29, 2008
Friday, February 01, 2008
This memorandum discusses the steps that a former shell company must take to comply with the SEC Staff’s position with respect to reporting financial statements in connection with mergers that cause a public shell company to cease being a shell company.
Posted by Anthony Cerminaro at Friday, February 01, 2008
Thursday, January 24, 2008
"ESOPs are most commonly used to provide a market for the shares of departing owners of successful closely held companies, to motivate and reward employees, or to take advantage of incentives to borrow money for acquiring new assets in pretax dollars. In almost every case, ESOPs are a contribution to the employee, not an employee purchase.
"An ESOP is a kind of employee benefit plan, similar in some ways to a profit-sharing plan. In an ESOP, a company sets up a trust fund, into which it contributes new shares of its own stock or cash to buy existing shares. Alternatively, the ESOP can borrow money to buy new or existing shares, with the company making cash contributions to the plan to enable it to repay the loan. Regardless of how the plan acquires stock, company contributions to the trust are tax-deductible, within certain limits.
"Shares in the trust are allocated to individual employee accounts...
"Owners of privately held companies can use an ESOP to create a ready market for their shares. Under this approach, the company can make tax-deductible cash contributions to the ESOP to buy out an owner's shares, or it can have the ESOP borrow money to buy the shares (see below). In C corporations, once the ESOP owns 30% of all the shares in the company, the seller can reinvest the proceeds of the sale in other securities and defer any tax on the gain...
"ESOPs are unique among benefit plans in their ability to borrow money. The ESOP borrows cash, which it uses to buy company shares or shares of existing owners. The company then makes tax-deductible contributions to the ESOP to repay the loan, meaning both principal and interest are deductible...
"As attractive as these tax benefits are, however, there are limits and drawbacks... Private companies must repurchase shares of departing employees, and this can become a major expense. The cost of setting up an ESOP is also substantial -- perhaps $30,000 for the simplest of plans in small companies and on up from there. Any time new shares are issued, the stock of existing owners is diluted. That dilution must be weighed against the tax and motivation benefits an ESOP can provide. Finally, ESOPs will improve corporate performance only if combined with opportunities for employees to participate in decisions affecting their work."
From this NCEO webpage.
Posted by Anthony Cerminaro at Thursday, January 24, 2008
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
"The considerations and observations listed below are by no means exhaustive, but may provide some guidance (or at least food for thought) if you are looking at acquiring a tech company, particularly a distressed tech company.
"1. Test the target’s accounts payable, accrued expenses and liabilities...
When considering the acquisition of truly distressed companies, the acquirer should also confirm that all 401(k) withholdings of employees have been properly deposited, and that all tax withholdings have been accounted for and forwarded to the appropriate federal or state agency.
2. Quantify the “Transaction Cost” of a successful transaction...
Buying companies is expensive, and when an acquirer is buying a distressed company Although this list is not exhaustive, the “one off” transaction costs include:
(a) Target’s attorney’s fees (for which payment at closing will be expected).
(b) Target’s investment bank or business broker’s success fees, if one was engaged.
(c) Cost of target’s fairness opinion, if one was obtained.
(d) Acquirer’s attorney’s fees (probably due in the ordinary course, not at closing).
(e) Possible costs associated with any consents required from target’s accountants.
3. Quantify the “Business Cost” of a successful transaction.
Similar to transaction costs, there are a number of “one off” business costs associated with an acquisition that should be quantified during the due diligence process. These include:
(a) Payments due under change of control agreements or severance agreements post acquisition.
(b) The cost of buying out leases or other costs associated with discontinuing certain operations of the target or consolidating the operations of acquirer and target.
4. Review customer contracts or licenses for out of market terms...
Terms to be aware of include:
(a) “Fixed price” contracts that require completion of a project and all warranty work at a single price.
(b) Unlimited liability of the target for work performed or intellectual property licensed to a customer.
(c) Non-competition clauses which limit the target’s ability to provide services or products to other clients in the same line of business as the customer.
(d) License terms which authorize the customer to re-license or resell target products or intellectual products built for the customer by target.
(e) Terms which permit or do not prohibit customers from hiring target’s employees.
(f) Terms which allow customers to cancel agreements or obtain other relief from target in the event of a change in control of target.
5. Confirm that intellectual property and human capital are in place...
6. Test and confirm the sales pipeline...
7. Review (and renegotiate) severance arrangements with target management...
8. Identify third-party agreements to be restructured...
9. Test the proposed acquisition structure...
At a minimum, one of the factors considered in pricing the offer should be the analysis of the market stigma facing the target’s business.
10. Do Not be afraid to abandon the transaction..."
Read more in this article by Jude Sullivan from which the foregoing is quoted.
Saturday, December 29, 2007
Set forth here is a form of consulting agreement available from the collection of OneCle.com Business Contracts from SEC filings. OneCle provides a useful reservoir of publicly available contracts.
The problem, however, with using these or any other contracts as a model for your agreement is that your situation may differ in significant ways from the circumstances surrounding the publicly available contract (the "PAC"). For instance, the PAC may or may not have been subject to negotiation. Thus, the PAC may be stronger or weaker from your point of view than your agreement could be.
For example, the below agreement, although not completely unfair to the Consultant, could be substantially improved from the Consultant's perspective. For instance, the indemnity provision is overly broad. At the very least, a mutual indemnity obligation on the part of the Company could be negotiated.
Also, it is commercially reasonable for the Consultant to make more limited Warranties and Representations than are present below. In addition, standard UCC disclaimer language is usually appropriate in such an agreement. So too would be provisions limiting the Company's remedies for breach of contract, limiting the Consultant's liability for incidental and consequential damages and limiting the total dollar amount of the Consultant's exposure to liability.
Friday, December 28, 2007
Thursday, December 20, 2007
While a good example of a mutual non-disclosure agreement may be found at this docstoc.com page, caution is always appropriate when considering the use of form documents. It is essential to understand fully the legal implications of each provision and to tailor the form to the particular circumstances in which it will be employed.
Posted by Anthony Cerminaro at Thursday, December 20, 2007
Monday, December 17, 2007
"Incoterms are standard trade definitions most commonly used in international sales contracts. Devised and published by the International Chamber of Commerce,...correct use of Incoterms goes a long way to providing the legal certainty upon which mutual confidence between business partners must be based. To be sure of using them correctly, trade practitioners need to consult the full ICC texts, and to beware of the many unauthorized summaries and approximate versions that abound on the web...
Incoterms 2000 provides Preambles explaining the function of each Incoterm. These are reproduced in full for visitors to this site. For example, the Preamble to FAS FREE ALONGSIDE SHIP states that under FAS the seller delivers when the goods are placed alongside the vessel at the named port of shipment. "The buyer has to bear all costs and risks of loss of or damage to the goods from that moment."
Click on any of the 13 terms listed below and read a concise definition from the Preambles to Incoterms 2000. Several of the Preambles, marked below with an *, include a footnote referring to the Introduction. Click anywhere on those pages to view the relevant part of the Introduction. Please note that the terms will appear on your screen in read-only format and so cannot be copied or printed.
EXW EX WORKS (named place)*
FCA FREE CARRIER (named place)
FAS FREE ALONGSIDE SHIP (named port of shipment)*
FOB FREE ON BOARD (named port of shipment)
CFR COST AND FREIGHT (named port of destination)
CIF COST, INSURANCE AND FREIGHT (named port of destination)*
CPT CARRIAGE PAID TO (named place of destination)
CIP CARRIAGE AND INSURANCE PAID TO (named place of destination)*
DAF DELIVERED AT FRONTIER (named place)*
DES DELIVERED EX SHIP (named port of destination)
DEQ DELIVERED EX QUAY (named port of destination)*
DDU DELIVERED DUTY UNPAID (named place of destination)*
DDP DELIVERED DUTY PAID (named place of destination)*
Posted by Anthony Cerminaro at Monday, December 17, 2007
Friday, December 14, 2007
"On paper, it all seems so perfect: You’ve targeted the ideal company to acquire, the PowerPoint slides are screaming “upside,” you’ve done your financial and legal research, and you’ve given the other company a heads-up that you’re interested in making an offer. (See our previous BNET feature, “Evaluating Potential Mergers,” on how to get through those first stages.)
Now comes the hard part: the process of closed-door bargaining that leads to the real deal.
While there is no absolute rulebook that governs the incalculable variables involved in merger bargaining, there is a method to this aspect of M&A madness. We interviewed dozens of M&A veterans — from both sides of the table — and distilled some of the best thinking on negotiating into a four-step BNET Crash Course.
Best-selling author and merger guru James Freund also shares his 10 rules of bargaining. And, since negotiations rarely go as planned, we’ve identified some common mistakes that can derail good deals, and we explain how to avoid each.
From Be a Master M&A Negotiator on BNET.com
Posted by Anthony Cerminaro at Friday, December 14, 2007